Home : Vehicle Reviews : Ford Motor Company : 2003 Mazda Tribute (Ford Escape)

2003 Mazda Tribute (Ford Escape)

Review Notes: 2003 Mazda Tribute ES V6 Automatic
Quirks Front wheel drive 4×4?
Gas mileage 18 city, 23 highway (EPA)
Unusual features Standard front wheel drive
Available from Ford with blue oval on grille and “Escape” badging
Above Average Safety, highway acceleration, 2WD handling and ride
Needs Work In Refinement of some controls, 4×4 tire squeal
Bottom-scraper test Superior

2003 Mazda Tribute (Ford Escape) 

The original large SUVs were truck-based, built on the same platform as pickups with rear wheel drive and big V8 engines. Slowly, though, smaller Japanese models became popular, led by Suzuki and the more successful, the Toyota RAV-4. It was only a matter of time before mid-sized front-wheel drive SUVs appeared, based on car platforms rather than trucks. The Tribute is probably the most popular of this new breed, when its blue-oval counterpart is figured in. It combines the height and shape of an SUV with relatively safe front wheel drive, throwing in a decent ride and handling. By SUV standards, the gas mileage is good, at 18 city, 23 highway, the same as a standard-wheelbase minivan, which is only a little larger inside. But style-conscious buyers need have no fear of comparison, given the deliberately “SUV-like” styling, inside and out. There are plenty of bulges to show that this is not a minivan, though that is what most of the owners will use it as. Inside, numerous cues show that this is an SUV, not a minivan.

The instrument panel, despite an affected style for holding the various indicator lights, is easy to read, with a large tachometer and speedometer. The backlighting is clear and easy to read at night.

Since this is not a true off-roader, there’s no low-range four wheel drive, but four wheel drive is available with the touch of a button for traction on slippery surfaces. This is not all wheel drive, and the system should be left off on “merely” wet roads.

Most controls are straightforward and well designed. Our complaints are minor – a cruise control that feels cheap (but works well), an old-fashioned climate control system which combines the vent and air conditioning controls, and the automatic’s tendency to slight past Reverse and into Neutral or Drive. Otherwise, we applaud using a column shift for the automatic and a stick shift for the manual transmission. The only other major quirk is a power window lockout which not only freezes the passengers from raising or lowering the windows, but locks out the driver, too.

Our vehicle had the optional V6, putting out 200 horsepower from three liters. That transmission made the Tribute move quite quickly, so that passing and acceleration were easy and fast – better on the highway than the ten-second 0-60 times would indicate. The transmission has firm shifts, especially when kicking down to lower gears, but sometimes got confused and “flared” (let the engine rev between gears while it figured out what to do). The four cylinder can only manage 130 horsepower, but comes only with a manual transmission available, which should help equal things out.

2003 Mazda Tribute (Ford Escape) Handling was interesting, with a stable feel but some tire screeching, especially when turning while accelerating (thanks to the front wheel drive). That’s not a bad price to pay for avoiding the oversteer of rear wheel drive, but it could be annoying. Our four wheel drive model had less capable handling than the standard front wheel drive, because of the higher suspension.

Compared with many other SUVs, handling and ride are superior, though General Motors and Jeep have raised the bar with the TrailBlazer and Liberty. Our test car was also jittery on rough pavement, but two wheel drive models are most likely smoother and handle better than our test car, which had four wheel drive and a higher ride.

Visibility is very good, with a large rear window. The bright fog lights have a high dispersion, which we suspect annoyed other drivers, while the ordinary headlights did their job well.

The interior has lots of places to put things, but all had hard plastic surfaces, resulting in buzzes and rattles when used. Our model had a small opening under the radio (we put an EZ-Pass there), another by the power outlet, and large openings under that and at the bottom of the center console. The covered portion of the center console is huge and easily swallows up a full size box of tissues along with a bunch of CDs, cassettes, and doodads. There are also two primitive but effective cupholders up front, an overhead sunglass carrier, and map pockets on both front doors. Rear passengers get relatively shallow cupholders from a foldout portion of the center console.

2003 Mazda Tribute (Ford Escape) The interior is reasonably sized, not huge and also not cramped. The cargo bay is also reasonable, and the seats flip and fold to extend the flat floor (they have a 2/3 split for added flexibility). You can raise the rear window separately from the rear door; both are easy to raise and lower, and quietly go back into position without a slam. With all the seats folded and moved forward, you can fit a 4 x 8 sheet of plywood in. There is also storage underneath the cargo area’s floor, though to get to it you have to lift up a cheap cloth and sound insulation.

Safety is built in, if NHTSA can be believed, with five star side impact and front driver’s side ratings, and a four star front passenger side rating.

The Tribute ES V6 tips the scales at $24,000, including the automatic, cruise, tilt steering, antilock brakes, a six-way power driver’s seat, leather, CD, and power locks and windows. Our model had a number of options, including an alarm, spoiler, wheel locks, side airbags, premium audio (with cassette), and an inexpensive towing package ($355) which includes an oil cooler and wiring. We recommend everyone get the towing package – you might need it, and they usually come with heavier duty components (with it, you can tow 3,500 pounds).

2003 Mazda Tribute (Ford Escape) Overall, though, our vehicle listed for $26,700, in range with a Jeep Grand Cherokee V8 and Chevrolet TrailBlazer, as well as the less-capable Ford Explorer. The base price of the Tribute DX is $18,155, in line with a well equipped but smaller Jeep Liberty and PT Cruiser. The Liberty has good comfort, power, ride, and handling are good, as well as Rubicon readiness, but gas mileage is relatively low. The PT has superior handling, similar acceleration (better with the stick), and more comfort, but is smaller. Both have good ride height and well-liked styling.

Overall, there are reasons why the Tribute is so popular – it’s peppy, easy to live with, has decent handling, and costs much less than many competitive SUVs. We’d certainly take a Tribute over a similarly priced Ford Explorer. On the other hand, it costs more than a minivan with better capabilities, if you don’t mind the styling.

If you’re going to look at an SUV – especially a Ford Escape or Explorer – take a look at the Tribute before deciding.

 

Model Specifications – 2003 Ford Escape

POWERTRAIN
2003 Specifications
Body Style
  4-door SUV
Powertrain/Chassis
EPA Class SUV
Drivetrain Layout Front- or Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Type 2.0L Zetec DOHC I-4,
iron block, aluminum heads;
3.0L Duratec DOHC V-6,
aluminum block and heads
Valvetrain 4 valves per cylinder
Bore/Stroke (in/mm)
Zetec 3.39 x 3.52 / 84.8 x 88.0
Duratec 3.5 x 3.13 / 89.0 x 79.5
Displacement (cu in/cc)
Zetec 121/1983
Duratec 180/2966
Compression Ratio
Zetec 9.6:1
Duratec 10.0:1
Horsepower @ rpm
Zetec 127 @ 5400
Duratec 201 @ 5900
Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)
Zetec 135 @ 4500
Duratec 196 @ 4700
Redline
Zetec (rpm) 6600
Duratec (rpm) 6450
Recommended Fuel 87 octane (minimum)
Fuel System Sequential multi-port electronic fuel injection
(SEFI)
Fuel Tank Size (Gallons) 15 (I-4); 16 (V6)
Oil Capacity
with filter
(quarts)
Zetec 4.5
Duratec 5.5
Coolant Capacity (quarts)
Zetec (MT) 5.3
Zetec (AT) 6.3
Duratec (AT) 10.6
Transmission G5M Ford CD4E
5-speed 4-speed
transaxle, transaxle,
manual automatic
overdrive overdrive
Final Drive Ratio
G5M MT 4.588:1
CD4E 3.0 AT 3.776:1
Gear Ratio
  MT 5-speed AT 4-speed
1st 3.67:1 2.89:1
2nd 2.06:1 1.57:1
3rd 1.31:1 1.00:1
4th 1.03:1 0.70:1
5th 0.84:1 n/a
Reverse 3.45:1 2.31:1
Suspension
Front (4×2 / 4×4) MacPherson
independent struts,
coil springs and
stabilizer bar
Rear (4×2 / 4×4) Multi link
Steering
Type Power rack and pinion
Ratio
Zetec 16.0:1
Duratec 16.8:1
Turns lock-to-lock 3.0 (I-4) and 2.9 (V-6)
Turning Circle,
Curb-to-curb (ft) 35.4
Brakes
Brakes (system type) Front disc and
Standard rear drum,
four-channel ABS
Optional EBD (Electronic Brake force
Distribution)
(EBD standard on XLT /
optional on XLS)
Front 10.9-in vented disc
Rear 9.0-in drum
Total Swept Area (f/r) 232.02 / 93.45
Wheels and Tires
Wheels 15-in standard
  16-in optional
Tires 225/70R15
235/70R16
Number of Lug Nuts 5

Consumer Info

Assembly Plant Kansas City,
Missouri, USA
Basic Warranty 3 year/36,000-mile
bumper-to-bumper
Roadside Assist 3 years/36,000 miles
Air bags Standard second-generation dual front air bags
Optional side-impact air bags

DIMENSIONS

EXTERIOR
Wheelbase 103.1
Track f/r 61.2/61.0
Overall Length 173.0
Overall Width 70.1
Overall Height 69.1
Coefficient of drag 0.404
Ground clearance 7.8
Front overhang 33.4
Rear overhang 36.4
Angle of approach (degrees) 28.5
Ramp breakover angle (degrees) 20.0
Departure angle (rear bumper) (degrees) 22.0
Interior
Headroom
1st row 40.4
2nd row 39.2
Shoulder room
1st row 56.3
2nd row 55.9
Hip room
1st row 53.4
2nd row 49.0
Maximum legroom
1st row 42.7
2nd row 36.4
Cargo capacity (cu ft)
(rear seat up/rear seat down) 33.1/69.2
Base Curb Weight (POUNDS)
Zetec (MT) 4×2 3019
Zetec (MT) 4×4 3175
Duratec (AT) 4×2 3181
Duratec (AT) 4×2 3346
MAXIMUM Payload Capacity (POUNDS)
With manual transmission
Zetec (MT) 4×2 1080
Zetec (MT) 4×4 1060
With automatic transmission
Duratec (AT) 4×2 1180
Duratec (AT) 4×4 1140
Maximum Towing Capacity (POUNDS)
Engine
Zetec (MT) 1000
Duratec (AT) 2000
Duratec w/Towing Pkg. 3500
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVWR)
Zetec (MT) 4×2 4120
Zetec (MT) 4×4 4260
Duratec (AT) 4×2 4380
Duratec (AT) 4×4 4520
Maximum GCWR (Gross Combined
Weight Rating)
Zetec (MT) 4×2 4180
Zetec (MT) 4×4 4340
Duratec (AT) 4×2 5340
w / Tow Package 6880
Duratec(AT) 4×4 5500
w / Tow Package 7040
Maximum Loaded
Trailer Weight
Zetec (MT) 4×2 1000
Zetec (MT) 4×4 1000
Duratec (AT) 4×2 2000
w / Tow Package 3500
Duratec (AT) 4×4 2000
w / Tow Package 3500

About Rick Webster

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Scroll To Top