|
|
|
| Author |
Messages |
|
primetimek5
Lift & Lockers
Posts:537
 |
| 12/13/2007 4:54 PM |
|
| im thinking of going to iroks |
|
rick p. |
|
|
webby4x4
Forum Admin, Magazine Editor
Rock Star
Posts:2375
|
| 12/13/2007 7:34 PM |
|
| What size Iroks are you thinking about running? |
|
Rick Webster
Editor, 4X4REVIEW.COM - A Tork Media, Inc. Publication
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
'74 FJ40 Land Cruiser
"Measure once, cut twice" |
|
|
primetimek5
Lift & Lockers
Posts:537
|
| 12/14/2007 5:26 AM |
|
39.5s.
my last set of tires were 46mich xls. they are on rockwells.
now im back into one tons. (thinking about saving my back. |
|
rick p. |
|
|
webby4x4
Forum Admin, Magazine Editor
Rock Star
Posts:2375
|
| 12/14/2007 7:04 AM |
|
The 39.5's will work well then. I've heard the smaller versions aren't as good on the rocks as SSR's, but the larger ones are pretty amazing. I watched a set in Tellico really work well, especially when the rocks were slimy with mud and water.
Send us a photo when you get your junk rollin' on forties!
Rick |
|
Rick Webster
Editor, 4X4REVIEW.COM - A Tork Media, Inc. Publication
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
'74 FJ40 Land Cruiser
"Measure once, cut twice" |
|
|
yoda
Bone Stock
Posts:0
|
| 12/15/2007 10:10 AM |
|
PTK5,
I'm considering the 39.5 IROKs as well. Are you going Bias ply or radial? I have heard arguments that the radials stick and conform better on the rocks, but that the Bias ply is allot tougher. Besides there is about a $50 difference in price. My money is gonna be on the Bias Ply for the sheer toughness. If I drove my Jeep on the street more I would definately go with the radial, but that's not the case anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Please login or register to post a message or a reply. |
|
|
|
ActiveForums 3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|